How is the number of engineers required to build facilities calculated?

I’ve noticed that the number of engineers required to build subsequent facilities (e.g. a second satellite uplink) is larger than the number required for the first facility. What factors determine the number of engineers required?

  • What are the differences between normal and classic difficulties?
  • Will a sniper with squad sight on overwatch fire at targets allies can see?
  • How can I kill an enemy under mind control?
  • Does the type of kill matter for promotion?
  • Why do the cars my soldiers are hiding behind keep exploding?
  • Should I keep Alien Containment?
  • What attribute values should I look for in my X-Com Troopers?
  • Are there any advantages to stunning an alien besides being able to interrogate it?
  • How do you flank an enemy?
  • Is there a way to recognize destructible environment in XCOM:Enemy Unknown?
  • How do stats affect to-hit percentages?
  • How many civilians do I need to save on terror missions?
  • 2 Solutions collect form web for “How is the number of engineers required to build facilities calculated?”

    The number of engineers required for facilities depends on the number of similar facilities that have been previously built. (It appears engineers in the new XCOM are capable of working on an infinite number of tasks simultaneously, provided the tasks are sufficiently different from one another.)

    Six engineers are required to build the first workshop, fifteen for the second, and ten additional for each additional workshop, the number of scientists required per laboratory is similar.

    For satellite uplinks, the formula is (10 * SU + 15 * SN), where SU is the number of satellite uplinks already built (or under construction), and SN is the corresponding number of satellite nexuses. That is, you need ten engineers per satellite uplink, with the first uplink (already built at the start of the game) being free.

    For satellite nexuses, the formula is 5 + (10 * SU + 15 * SN).

    Satellite Uplinks vs. Satellite Nexuses

    If we ignore adjacency bonuses, as nexuses provide double the uplinks for half again the number of engineers, this means the engineer cost of satellite nexuses is lower per satellite.

    Factoring in adjacency bonuses, the upper limit is four satellites per uplink or six per nexus: each facility can particpate in four adjacency bonuses, but each adjacency bonus is shared between two facilities, so we get maximum two bonuses per facility. This 4:6 uplink ratio equals the 10:15 ratio of required engineers, so an infinite plane of satellite uplinks would provide the same number of uplinks per engineer as an infinite plane of satellite nexuses.

    Since we’ll never come close to approximating an infinite spread of satellite uplinks, in practice, nexuses will always have a lower engineer cost.

    However, since they require alien materials to construct, and since having more engineers lowers the quantity of both money and alien materials needed to build everything, if you’re short on materials, it’s better to aggressively push the number of engineers, and build regular uplinks, saving the alien materials for armor and weapons.

    If, on the other hand, you have a surplus of alien materials, the lower engineer, power, and space requirements of satellite nexuses provide more uplinks faster, and cost fewer credits.

    It’s not related to location – it’s fixed based upon how many of the same type of building you already have i.e. the first Workshop requires 6 engineers, the second 15 engineers, the third is 25 engineers and so on… (I can’t remember the rest – but it is fixed).

    edit: having played another game – I noticed it increments workshops by +10 engineers per workshop, so the 4th is 35 engineers, the 5th is 45 engineers and so on…

    We love Playing Games, especially Video Games.